How Fast Is Your Website?

Friday, May 1st, 2009
FireBug extension for Firefox
Image by zerok via Flickr

Yahoo recently updated one of their tools for grading and optimizing websites.  It’s called YSlow, and it checks your site for several different decisions and tools which you (or your web designer) may have implemented.

YSlow is an add on to the Firebug tool which is a Firefox extension – so at this point, you can’t run it in any other browser, however both Firefox and Firebug are free tools so there is no cost to you other than time.

YSlow is nice because it rates things on a scale of A to F, for each of numerous categories.  It also gives a numeric score for the overall grade. By having it calculate where the biggest improvements could come from – it lets you quickly find areas to optimize. With the previous version, I took one website which had a horrible score of 18 (out of 100), and in an afternoon with some minor changes, brought it up to a 32.

Other websites I’ve taken from a 55-60 range and gotten them into the 80s – usually within just a few days, depending upon the complexity of the site.

Users perceive your site partially in how fast it responds – so the faster your site, the more likely they are to make purchases or other related decisions, so optimizing your site’s speed can be very important to the health of your site.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Popularity: unranked [?]

Saving Money with SEO

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

SEO (Search Engine Optimization) is a way for your company to get new visitors by using search engines like Google, Yahoo, and MSN Live Search. Some people will say that they don’t like to spend money on SEO, because who knows how much money they are spending, and can they get any return on their investment (ROI) for their optimization. Some people even wonder if SEO works at all, saying it is nothing more than 21st century snake oil.

Well I’ve never thought so. When I set up an SEO campaign, one of the things I do, is also set up some form of  website tracking. I want to be able to show the change in website traffic. I will use other tools to show where a site ranks for given keywords, and how many times those key words and phrases are used to find the site.

I send this information to clients because I want to show them what I do, and how it affects their websites, and business. Sometimes, as sites slowly start to rank better over the course of several months, the changes might mean that they don’t recognize the change.

client saves $25000 per year by optimizing his site for Google

client saves $25000 per year by optimizing his site for Google

All this is good, but when going through several tools I use, I found something more interesting for a customer.  I found a tool on-line which estimates what they save each month by ranking organically (coming up in the regular search listing) compared to if they had to buy those visitors using a pay-per-click type of advertising. See a small sample of this report on the right.

Turns out he is saving approximately $2100 per month, over $25000 per year, with how he ranked organically in Google alone. (This doesn’t include savings to be found with other web search tools, such as Yahoo, MSN Live Search, etc.) Now this was a report he could understand.

This customer is a small company, in a niche market, and so they don’t get a lot of traffic (several hundred visitors a day on average), so this ends up be a huge savings to them. Of course in our current economy, any savings can be viewed as good savings.

From now this will be part of the standard reports I send people when I work on search engine optimization for clients.

If you are interested in expanding the reach of your website through search engine optimization, saving money on pay-per-click campaigns, or even finding out about how well your website is performing, please contact walt design and development for more information.

Popularity: unranked [?]

Search Engines and Flash Files

Thursday, July 31st, 2008

In the past, the search engines (Google, Yahoo, Microsoft Live, et all) couldn’t really search Flash files that well. Well Adobe has been working with the search engines to allow them to search the Flash sites, widgets, buttons, and more.

This is good news on the surface, but still requires one digging a little deeper before trying to get a nifty Flash site. Here are three quick take aways to know about, before

The first thing to know, is you still have to use text, as text, to be searchable. Many Flash developers convert the text into something known as shapes so that they can manipulate it easier to look nice on your screen. While your site will look nicer overall, it will cause the search engine to fail to read that part of you Flash site.

Second, most search engines cannot run JavaScript. Because of a software patent issue, Internet Explorer needs JavaScript to write the Flash file to the webpage. So now, in many cases, your Flash site is no longer searchable.

Flash screens, are not the same as web pages, and that means it will be harder to isolate a topic and rank for it, when looking at the overall site with all of the other text working along with it. Add upon that, that most Flash developers are inexperienced at Search Engine Optimization, and lack good tools to build a search optimized site (links, individual pages, helpful page elements, etc) they will most likely not be able to help you rank like a good HTML based website could.

Overall, I would hold off on developing your all Flash based sites if you are interested in long term Search Engine rankings. (Besides, most developers charge more for Flash sites – use that money to make more content which can rank in the search engines, it will be money better spent.)

SEOmoz has more information on his views on why Flash and Search Engines still don’t mix.

Popularity: 1% [?]

More Metrics – Where Your Visitors Come From

Friday, February 8th, 2008

Learning how our web site works is an important task. We’ve seen some simple examples in previous steps (visits, page views, and unique visitors) as well as determining how long someone visited your site, and which was the last page they viewed. We’ve shown how some pages are viewed more than others, and where people exit your web site. We’ve even shown what pages people come to your web site.

What we will look at now is how did they get to your web site. Before they were on your web site, odds are they were somewhere else. Knowing this tidbit of information changes everything, and starts to allow us bring things together.

In the past articles I’ve had a decidedly split view, why this matters, why this doesn’t matter. This is going to be one sided – this matters. And the follow up where your (quality) visitors come from, will matter even more as we show you how the metrics from the previous articles start to fold in with where your visitors come from.

You will get visitors from all over the Internet. Web sites you don’t know about link to you, and such. However, all of these methods/places can be grouped into the following categories.

  • Search Engine (organic) – this is where someone types in a question, and you site was on the list of answers. Depending upon the phrase entered, you may have little (rarely) or lots of competition.
  • Search Engine (paid inclusion/pay-per-click) – You have purchased key words/phrases, and when someone enters a phrase, your ad comes up. That person clicks on the ad, instead of an organic result, you get charged a fee, and they go to your site.
  • Online Ad Network – other networks beside those run from search engines exist, and you have purchased ads to be placed on websites based upon some criteria, and users came to your site from these ads.
  • Another Website – another website, be it a standard site, a blog, a forum, etc. has your.
  • Direct Access/Bookmark – someone typed in your web address or had previously bookmarked your site. This number is often a higher than it should be as sometimes the information used to pass where the visitor came from, isn’t passed. In that case, the Direct Access gets artificially inflated.

The question of course is, why is it this that matters? Here are how we look using the previous metrics to start to determine relevancy, and in how this metric matters.

Lets say you have a small business. And you have a few friends who like to refer their friends to your business. We all know that all referrals are not equal, and someone is going to send you better referrals than others. But how do you know which is which.

Obviously, the one that leads to the most sales is sending you the best referrals. But can you find out why that friend gives you the best referrals? Or better yet why?

You see, search engines, other sites that link to you, and your banner ads are your “friends”. They all want to send you visitors, just some are better at it than others. And just because someone refers a lot of people, doesn’t mean they are sending you the right visitors.

Lets say we look at some on-line ads you are using. You know that you are getting leads from them, sometimes 1000 a day. However, the users leave quickly after viewing the page. If you can segment your viewers and determine that 80% of the visitors that come to your site from this source “bounce” then you know you have a problem you have to address. You don’t know exactly why, maybe the leads/visitors aren’t qualified, or maybe the landing page (the page the visitor sees when clicking on the ad) is ineffective, but now you have something to start looking at to determine what to fix.

On the other hand, you have 1000 people coming from another web site, maybe Google Ad-Words and Yahoo’s pay-per-click. You can see from there that you have a bounce rate of 40%, and they tend to stay for 3 or 4 pages, by then 60-80% of people have left your site. Now we can look at a different set of problems. Could they not find how to buy? Did they get “fatigue” where they got tried of going through the pages? Now we can look at the exit pages, do they move from page to page as expected, or do they bounce around unexpectedly?

As you step through these numbers, I’m sure you will see that not all sources are equal. Some might result in lots of page views, but few conversions (sales, or requests for more information). This is why visitors, page views, and time on site are not necessarily good metrics. You have to learn what type of lead from a source is your best type.

Additionally you can start to segment your search engine data, be it from normal, organic, searches, or from paid search results. Now you can start to see what words and phrases people are using to find you, and how effective you are at converting those people into buyers. This is where your metric data starts to become real important.

Knowing what keywords and key phrases people are using to find your site when dealing with search engines. You might find that the phrases you would use, and you have optimized your site for, are not being used. Is this because there is too much competition, or because consumers use different words than expert/owners. It can also reveal when a phrase is ineffective, because it yields too low a conversion rate.

Knowing how many people repeat visit your site, and/or bookmark you site and directly access it indicates how valuable other’s feel your web site is. Likewise, if you find that most people visit from a given source once, but never return, you can start to see that they don’t place a high value on your site.

You may not be able to determine why people are leaving your site, but you can start to develop some good theories. Just start looking at it from a users point of view, and see what if anything you have to do to enhance your site to increase those conversions.

Popularity: 25% [?]