Google Chrome

In our last two posts we talked about Google Chrome. We looked most recently at why you should use Chrome. But to be fair, it isn’t the only browser out there, and some say it needs more polish to be a serious browser.

Here are some reasons to look at not using Chrome.

• (Currently) no extensions for Chrome. This will affect power users more than any one else, especially Firefox users. The power of extensions is immeasurable as it allows you to improve your experience on the web. Extensions are what makes Firefox the browser of choice for many users, and they will not likely willingly give up their favorite addons.
• I see ads. Chief among these extensions are the various Ad Blockers. It is in Google’s self interest to allow ads, as this is how they make their money. However displaying all these ads makes pages take longer to load and display. It also effects your bandwidth if you surf in a limited bandwidth environment.
• Some Internet Explorer 6 sites will not work. Some sites are designed strictly for IE6. This means that only IE will work, and in some cases not even newer versions of IE. I have to use a couple of these sites for work, so I still use Internet Explorer for them.
• No improvement in Flash Sites/Components. Google improved the JavaScript performance, because they do a lot with JavaScript. However, Flash is being used on many other sites to display graphs, charts, and add interactivity. I would say that Flash is used more often than JavaScript, and Flash is not addressed by Chrome.
• Lack of support for Linux and Macintosh computers. They are supposed to be coming however, but they are not here yet.
• Chrome is a stripped down browser in many ways. While this makes it easy to use, users may be confused by the lack of standard buttons, like there is no home button, or print button.
• Of course there are many rumors and fears about it being run by Google: (so far these are only fears, but who knows what future versions will hold)
  • Google can track my Internet use more
  • Google will prevent me from going to competing sites/search engines
  • Google will replace others ads with their own
  • Google will additional ads

Memory usage of Chrome Browser

Also interesting to note is that Chrome, while it is supposed to use a smaller memory foot print, might actually use more in the short term. This is because it uses multiple processes, each with their own memory usage, instead of one large chunk of memory. I’m currently running Chrome as my (almost) exclusive browser this week to see how it handles itself over time.

I also expect that when Chrome starts to allow extensions, it will slow a it down a bit.

Related articles by Zemanta

• Which Chrome Feature Do You Most Want in Your Browser? [Reader Poll]
• Google Chrome needs more than hype

Google Chrome

I wrote recently we talked about Google’s own browser, Chrome. I said that we would look at Chrome after use for a few days to see how it performs.

Google is of course smart, and designed a browser that will help push it’s goals.  Google wants you to do more on the web. This means making the web faster, easier, and safer.

So here are some positives I’ve found with the browser after using it for a week.

• Google has the ability to put their name behind it. On the Internet, Google is king, and they can use their influence to push for certain standards.
• Chrome has been built with speed in mind. They have changed the way several core components work under the hood to be more optimized. This should allow for a smaller memory footprint and faster execution. After using running it for several days straight, it does not seem to slow like other browsers do, and it does appear from just watching it, that pages display faster and JavaScript runs faster. This is especially important if you use a lot of web based applications, such as Gmail, Google Reader, Google Docs and more.
• Chrome is a standards based browser, which means that if it runs in Firefox, or especially Safari, it should run in Chrome.
• Chrome has been designed to be stronger in the security realm. Google is claiming that extra effort has been put into ensuring that Chrome’s risk to exploitation is lower than other browsers. This should reduce the potential security holes which allow viruses to attack and phishers to steal information.
• Google has the infrastructure to test the browser in ways others cannot. To test their new browser, they have looked at their search results and started tuning based upon which sites are most likely to be viewed by its users. I’ve had a few issues with a couple of sites, but I can count them on one hand.
• Chrome reduces crash risk. Every application can crash.  This is fact of computers. However, because of how Chrome was designed, if you run multiple tabs, and one crashes, it won’t take out the rest of your tabs.  So if you are working on an email, and another tab crashes, you don’t loose your email.

Because the market wasn’t crowded enough with different, free web browsers, Google has decided to add their own browser, called Chrome. So now in addition to Internet Explorer (active versions are 6 and 7, with 8 in beta) we now also have Firefox (with versions 2 and 3 both being actively used), Opera, Safari, and now Chrome. This does make it a bit challenging for a web developer to work.

For the End User

For the Web Developer and Web Site Owner

This will add another level of complexity to your web site design.  Luckily as a standards based browser, it should work well, if your site already works well with Safari and Firefox for example.

If you are developing complex client side apps, it should help you, as it works to improve the performance of the site.

Looking Forward

I’ve recently had a chance to see two different organizations prepare their users/constituents for change in very different ways.

Eliminating a Software Package

The first was a company which has bought out several companies. After about three years, they are looking to consolidate their product line, and will be eliminating some of their products. The bad news is, that this is a mission critical product which we use.

They pulled everyone together (over 114 people in an online webinar), and let them know in a little over 3 years they will not be supporting the current version of the product which they bought out. They laid out a general road map for the process and showed deficiencies between their product and the one we are currently using, and a general outline for how they will close the gaps in the upcoming years.

Image by pingnews.com via Flickr

Preparing for Disaster

The second is the state of Florida, where I happen to live. During the late summer months it is not uncommon to have the risk of a hurricane hanging over our heads. Hurricanes can bring heavy winds, lots of rain, and a potential for tornadoes. Any of which can be dangerous, even potentially fatal, but combined can create a nasty situation. The one “nice” thing about a hurricane is it generally gives you 3 to 5 days warning.

In preparation, the government usually reminds people to have clean drinking water, dry goods, flashlights and batteries, as well as other things you might need in case you lose power, have damage to your house etc. Most people head these warning, however there are always some fools who just plan a party.

Currently there is a storm which might turn into a hurricane the day that will probably make landfall.

So what does the state government do, 3.5 days before it might make landfall, the governor declares a State of Emergency.  Usually this is done after the hurricane hits, and usually only in affected areas.

Now I’ve lived through numerous hurricane, and had over $20,000 in damage due to them at one time, so I know what they can do, well before Katrina ever hit New Orleans.

Contrasting the Two Responses

Instead of a measured response, by declaring a state of emergency, the government risks panic, and not being taken seriously in a time of real need.

On the other hand, the company did what it could to reduce panic, and provide relevant information.

The web was used in both manners to disseminate information.  Remember, on the web, people can be reached faster, and the information is easy to forward, so you want to make sure important messages are handled quickly and correctly.

So the question is, which way are you more like to behave?